2 complete migrations
Crypto research coverage
Every material conclusion should show its claim, source, limitation, review window, conflict state, and decision boundary.
This board exposes the operating state of our current reviews. It is not a leaderboard, trust score, or automatic buy recommendation.

Stable, addressable claim IDs
54 primary sources in migrated claims
3 blocked / 1 conflict
Coverage board
Start with the visual map. Open the review or claim tables only when you need the full audit trail.
What the evidence currently says
41 migrated claims across the reviews currently in view. Bar length compares counts, not investment quality.
When evidence needs attention
Freshness is claim-specific. Identity and live execution expire faster than historical context.
Coverage depth by asset
Longer bars mean more of the planned claim model is published. They are not buy scores.
Freshness is assigned per claim
A single page date cannot make live liquidity, contract authority, protocol documentation, and historical context equally current.
Identity, authority, supply, liquidity, execution, and custody claims use the shortest practical review window.
Protocol, security, product, and mechanism claims are refreshed on material change or at the assigned due date.
Context and comparative claims remain visible but cannot clear a hard stop by themselves.
Status transitions
- Fresh becomes review-due as its claim-specific due date approaches.
- Review-due becomes stale after the due date passes without verification.
- Any critical contradiction changes coverage to conflict until a treatment is published.
- A current incident changes coverage to incident and freezes positive conclusions.
- Unknown or failed identity, authority, contract, liquidity, custody, or exit evidence changes coverage to blocked.
- A correction retires the old claim without deleting its public history.
Machine-readable access
The same stable IDs, claim-source links, freshness states, conflicts, and corrections are published for search and AI systems.
Open JSON dataset Open LLM indexConflicts and corrections stay visible
We resolve evidence disagreements with explicit treatment. Corrections retire a claim without deleting the history.
Conflict register
3controlledBuyback percentage denominator
The 12% headline applies to eligible trading fees, not to full trading volume.
TreatmentCalculate volume multiplied by the exact pool fee and current buyback share, then verify the on-chain collection and holding route.
conflict:raydium-buyback-percentageopenHistorical audit claim versus current contract record
The historical announcement channel referenced a V2 audit, while the reviewed Etherscan record shows no submitted security audit and only a similar-match source.
TreatmentKeep the audit gate blocked until the original report, auditor, scope, findings, fixes, and deployed-bytecode match are verified.
conflict:tking-audit-claimopenTIA unbonding documentation
The v7 parameter reference lists 337 hours while a general slashing guide retains older 21-day wording.
TreatmentUse the live chain parameter and transaction preview at decision time; preserve the documentation conflict publicly.
conflict:celestia-unbondingCorrection register
3Raydium Crypto Price Prediction 2022-2026-2030
The indexed URL and original publication date are preserved, but every point forecast and implied recommendation is retired. Price-target searches now receive user-supplied supply arithmetic, protocol-capture tests, hard-stop controls, route verification, source limitations, and an explicit exit process.
Open corrected review correction:raydium-point-forecastsTiger King Coin Review and Price Prediction
The original URL and publication date are preserved, but the price forecasts, exchange instructions, adoption assumptions, regulatory implication, and recommendation are withdrawn. The replacement begins with contract lineage, present project liveness, current liquidity, source limitations, test-sale execution, and total-loss controls.
Open corrected review correction:tking-promotional-forecastCelestial CELT and Celestia TIA were treated as the same research subject.
The current review separates unrelated CELT from native TIA and route-specific bridged representations.
Open corrected review correction:celestial-to-celestia